Kumiho THOTH S POD Kit Review

Thanks to HealthCabin, I’m back with another review, which is none other than another POD manufactured by Kumiho, named THOTH S. It’s the successor to a previous test subject, the THOTH T, but it can also be considered an improved edition, as the two devices are very similar, yet there are plenty of differences that I will mention during its presentation. As we’ve already become accustomed to with the THOTH T, the THOTH S is also a hybrid POD, suitable for both RDL and MTL use. In addition to adjustable airflow, the S model also has adjustable Wattage, allowing us to customize the experience much better. In this case, just like with the T model, vaporization works with both a button and a vacuum switch. It can be used with all THOTH type POD heads, so there will be no difference in the POD heads, not even in material, as they are made of the already well-known PCTG. However, the battery has shrunk a bit, as the S model only received a 1000mAh battery.

Made from zinc alloy and polycarbonate plastic, the THOTH S POD is available in 5 colors: green, black, red, grey, and silver. The silver one arrived with me. Now let’s take a closer look.

Kumiho THOTH S POD Kit Review


Box Contents and Getting to Know the Device

Like the THOTH T, the THOTH S comes with no accessories. In fact, they didn’t even include the metal necklace in the package this time. Apart from the user manual under the hard styrofoam (where the device lies), we get literally nothing else with the device. Essentially, nothing else is needed for its operation, as everyone has a USB-C charging cable at home, although an extra POD head would have fit in the package, alongside the factory-installed 0.6 ohm one.

As soon as we take it out of the box, we can start using it, as the S model arrives with a fully charged battery, the charge level of which we can now monitor on the 0.42" OLED display. The rubber button on the top left edge is a design element, as is the gear on the edge of the display. However, the button in the top right corner is the fire button itself, which protrudes slightly from the housing, indicating that it can be pressed. After 3 quick presses, the Wattage value starts to flash, which we can then adjust by pressing the fire button. With 5 quick presses, we can enter the menu, about which I will write a few lines in the next picture. The display shows the charge indicator bar, a lock icon, the Wattage value, the POD head’s Ohm value, and finally the puff count. Below the display is the fidget spinner, already familiar from the T model, this time with the slogan spinner for fun. It seems they glued it in place instead of using a magnetic solution, so it remained fixed in its position.

Now let’s return to the menu a bit, which is hinted at by the inscriptions ON/OFF, Wattage, LOCK around the fire button, as there is a minimal menu system in the THOTH S, which is quite enough for a POD. Of course, we won’t be able to do TC (Temperature Control), but in my opinion, a POD should be equipped with at least this much functionality. With 5 quick presses, we enter the menu, where, proceeding sequentially, we first see Puff Clear, which resets the puff count. Secondly, we encounter the Lock menu item, with which we can lock the fire button, and at this time, we will see a closed lock icon instead of an open one on the display. Since there is a one-button navigation, we can only lock the fire button with it, but the vacuum switch remains active, so this is a useful function. Finally, only Power Off remains, with which we can turn off the device. Each menu item can be activated by a single long press of 3 seconds.

On the left side of the device, we find an airflow slot with exactly the same 3 holes of gradually decreasing size as on the T model. The slider is tighter compared to the predecessor’s, slower to slide, which is good, but it was adequate on the previous model, it didn’t shift, so it was almost unnecessary to reinforce it, as it is now somewhat harder to move.

On the right side is the USB-C connector, through which we can charge the built-in battery of the S model, which has been reduced to 1000mAh compared to the T model’s 1300mAh battery. The manufacturer promises fast charging for this model as well; whether they kept that promise will be revealed later. Although the manufacturer did not include a necklace, those who buy the S model after the T model will have a necklace, as it comes standard with the T model. However, it’s not worth digging it out, because although the hole on the S model is no longer in an inaccessible place, it is much larger than the one on the T model, so we cannot attach the necklace to it. However, an old phone lanyard can be looped through it. Well, let’s move on…

There has been a small redesign on the connector inside the device. It looks a bit different, but the essence remains largely the same. 2 strong magnets, with 2 pin connectors. However, what is different compared to the T model is the airflow. On the S model, the air hole from which the POD head receives air directly has been enlarged, making it much airier, which favors atomizers with lower resistance. This suggests that less liquid condensation will occur, as it will heat up less. The factory-installed 0.6 ohm POD head in the S model does not heat up as much as the 1 ohm POD head in the T model, so this is a huge positive change that I was very happy about, as heating has always detracted from the experience for me.

On the back, there are only a few design elements, and here too we can find the numbering 002, which indicates that this is, so to speak, the second, improved edition of the THOTH T, now named THOTH S. However, what is misleading is that there is a button-like design element with the inscriptions mode 1, mode 2, mode 3 around it. This, of course, does nothing, it’s just a piece of rubber, but it looks good. Also, if we lay the device down flat, that small rubber button lifts it off the surface, so the back won’t get scratched.

HealthCabin sent one of each of all existing THOTH POD heads, with resistances increasing by 0.2 Ohm each, specifically 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1, and 1.2 Ohms. Of course, these also have their recommended Wattage ranges. The 0.4 is recommended for 25-35W, the 0.6 for 20-25W, the 0.8 for 16-20W, the 1 for 12-15W, and the 1.2 for 10-12W. We can adjust the Wattage on the Kumiho THOTH S, but the device only allows it within the pre-set recommended Wattage range for the atomizers. The POD heads are 2ml, but we can also order 3ml ones, and as seen in the picture, black or transparent ones, you just need to look in the mentioned webshop’s Kumiho THOTH Series POD Cartridge selection.

I wrote about the internal differences above, now let’s look at both from the outside a bit. Kumiho has broken away from the Radio Vape design, so the THOTH S now returns in a much cleaner and more elegant form, it also became a bit smaller, giving it a square shape, and it was thinned down, and the POD cartridge moved from the right side to the left side. The huge fire button is also a thing of the past, and even the lanyard holes are more accessible, although, as I wrote above, we can’t attach much to them, but who cares… So, it’s not only equipped with sufficient knowledge, but it’s also better externally than it was!

Of course, as with its predecessor, and with most devices like this, we should be careful not to fill the POD cartridge completely. Always leave a small air bubble to avoid gurgling. Although since it’s a leak-proof POD cartridge, it won’t leak and the gurgling will stop quickly, it’s better to prevent such problems.

Externally and internally, several differences can be found between the predecessor THOTH T and the THOTH S. Visually, I repeat, visually, the 002 version turned out very well, but now let’s see what it produces during use.


User Experience Report

The weight of both devices is roughly the same, but due to the dimensions and the housing design, the S model is much more comfortable and fits better in the hand, and of course, it’s also much more aesthetically pleasing with a cleaner design. Although they didn’t mention that there would be rubber parts on the device here and there, it’s okay, because these are elements that are usually glued on afterwards, so they might not necessarily be part of the device housing during manufacturing. This time, the fidget spinner is bomb-proof! However, its accessibility in the bottom right corner is not very comfortable, so when I wanted to play with it, I sometimes had trouble holding the device in a way that allowed me to fiddle with the fidget spinner. So, it’s great that they fixed it, but it’s relatively uncomfortable to use, so for me, it wasn’t a spinner for fun, but a spinner for upset[1]. Not to mention, it’s also very loud, so I think the implementation of this idea went a bit wrong, even though I tried to like it and be happy about it, but unfortunately, it’s not really enjoyable in this form. Moreover, the fidget spinner often got stuck, for example, when I took it out of my pants pocket, which is only a significant problem if it gets stuck in a way that it also falls out. Unfortunately, it’s not durable enough to withstand rough treatment, but I’ll explain this further down.

In contrast, the pressure point of the button is perfect! Since it’s small, the pressure point is under the entire button, and the material used makes it comfortable. It reacts instantly to anything we want to adjust on the device, so I had no problems with that. However, when we lock the fire button, it only locks the firing function, meaning it won’t fire in a bag or pocket, but we can still access the menu after 5 quick presses, and we can also adjust the Wattage independently of whether it’s firing, so it’s comfortable to use even with the fire locked. The device even detects whether we press the button slowly or quickly, because if we press it slowly, it displays the Lock message after the first press, but if we press it quickly, even 3 or 5 times, it will proceed to perform the desired method. I think this is an extremely advantageous solution, but there is a small negative aspect around it. When it displays the Lock message, the vacuum switch doesn’t work, meaning we can’t draw for those few seconds, which is bearable but can be annoying, and it’s a bit incomprehensible that such a message overrides the function for which the device was designed. The display brightness is perfectly fine, and all values are clearly visible even in sunlight; of course, it’s a bit dimmer then, but still clearly legible.

The POD cartridges are designed to be long-lasting, but as we know, this is very relative, as it depends on the e-liquid how long we can use them. With a really sweet e-liquid, a POD cartridge lasted me 6-7 days, which isn’t bad, as in an RTA, it would have lasted a maximum of 2-3 days. It delivers flavors very well, is intense, and there’s plenty of vapor, and even the 0.4 Ohm POD cartridge was only lukewarm, which is absolutely bearable, so I had no complaints about that. I first tried the 0.6 Ohm POD cartridge that came with the device, and at 20 Watts, the 1000mAh battery lasted for about 10 hours, which is also not bad. The aforementioned 0.6 Ohm POD cartridge, driven at the same power, lasted for approximately 160 puffs before emptying, but this is subjective; it could be more or less, depending on how hard one puffs. The 0.4 Ohm POD cartridge lasted for about 120 puffs at 30 Watts, and its battery life was 8-9 hours, which is also not bad. In fact, considering it’s only a 1000mAh battery, this is almost miraculous at such Ohm values! And what I was truly satisfied with is that this time there was no disappointment regarding fast charging, as the Kumiho THOTH S charged from 0-100% in exactly 1 hour.Externally, I really like it, I think it’s much prettier than the T model, it has also developed a lot in terms of features, it’s great that it got a display and setting options, I’m very happy about that, BUT! Because there’s always a (or even more) BUT! As I wrote above, the fidget spinner can get caught on anything, and at an unfortunate moment, the device can fall because of it. This is exactly what happened to me, around the 8th day, as a result of which the paint came off in a few places, but a much bigger problem is that the device simply went crazy afterward and malfunctions too often! This manifested in it frequently burning out the heating coil from then on, and when inserting/removing the POD head, it showed a different Ohm value than what was actually in it. I had to repeatedly insert and remove the POD head until it correctly identified which one was inside. Imagine this: when the 0.6 Ohm coil was in it, it saw it as 0.8 or 1 Ohm, which is a problem because it then sets itself to the Watt value set by the manufacturer, making it practically unusable. And when we don’t notice that it has set itself to the wrong Ohm value (we put it back after refilling and don’t check the display), it starts burning the coil in the POD head without exception, regardless of whether the Watt value it set is lower than what it was used at. So, the vaping experience is only satisfactory if the Ohm value matches what is stated on the POD head. The Watt value is secondary in this case, as it stays within the manufacturer’s preset limits. Although it did burn out 1-2 times even then, and sometimes misread before it fell, it wasn’t as bothersome, and I could easily blame my sweet liquid for the burning, but I couldn’t explain the misreading even then, and it was enough to remove and reinsert it 2 times at most to bring it back to its senses. But now I know that this whole problem could have been foreseen, I just didn’t think about it, since the sweet liquid could also cause burning, and a small contact issue could cause misreading, but it’s quite serious if it doesn’t recognize the POD head even after multiple attempts. It’s also interesting that I never ran the POD head coils at their maximum, but either at the lower limit or somewhere in between, so it didn’t burn out because I maxed it out. In contrast, I had no such problems with the T model! In fact, its vaping is much more stable and consistent!
But there’s something else here, oh boy… When used while charging, it doesn’t vape at the set Watt value, but increases the “RPM” (or power output) to a higher level, which it doesn’t display on the screen, but the experience immediately reveals it! The sound of vaping, the temperature of the vapor, the density of the inhaled vapor, all are much faster, louder, warmer, more noticeable. But these should be understood in a negative sense, as the coil suffers from all of this in the meantime! The crackling sound after a puff also appears, which means the Watt is too high, it’s not cooling properly, ergo it will burn out, or has already burned out! Once the battery is charged, nothing helps with this anymore, not turning the device on and off, not removing and reinserting the POD head, nor lowering the power setting, because it’s as if it’s stuck at the maximum 35 Watts and nothing can change it! This error only gradually starts to subside when the battery drains a bit and it no longer tries to push out maximum power. And this is not due to the fall; it did this during the first charge and afterward! I think the aforementioned error, or rather malfunction, would have occurred sooner or later, but the fall unfortunately accelerated the process.


I believe that due to the above, the usual pro-con list would be pointless, as I cannot wholeheartedly and without a guilty conscience encourage anyone to buy the Kumiho THOTH S! I also cannot promise that the issues mentioned above will not occur with others. I can only hope that I got a faulty unit! In terms of taste and vapor, it would be good, but such a major flaw for this much money, no thanks! And it started out so well…

Thank you for reading! Have a nice day! :hugs:


  1. The term “spinner for fun” refers to a playful, entertaining element, while “spinner for upset” refers to one that causes annoyance. In this case, the fidget spinner in the THOTH S device, originally intended as an entertainment feature, became rather frustrating for the user due to its difficult usability and frequent jamming. (AI explanation) ↩︎

18 Likes

Jó leírás, köszi :+1::hugs: kíváncsi voltam, és a véleményem nem változott.
Zsákutcának érzem az összes ilyen majomkodó kütyüt, folyamatosan ontják őket, ergo rengeteg szemetet termelnek ezzel. Mindig jön újítás, új ötlet, más formaterv, más tartozékok, szóval a kompatibilitás is mindig kap egy pofont :roll_eyes: amúgy meg főkészüléknek pláne nem bíznék meg benne. Szóval tipikus: mindent akar tudni pár ezer forintból, látványos giccs is egyben, komoly munkára nem képes, nem megbízható, nem tartós, játszani meg…most kezdjem el egy dobozba gyűjteni őket? :grin: De biztos megvan a célközönség. Sajnos többnyire gyerekek,.kocabagósok, poénvásárlók.
Tök jó, de minek… :thinking:

Gloves Crocs GIF by 60 Second Docs

9 Likes

Vannak jó POD-ok a piacon, de ez nem az a gyártó. :woman_shrugging:

Azt most vettem csak észre, hogy kimaradt az élménybeszámolóból, hogy miután elégette a porlasztót, már olyan szinten kilengett a mérés, hogy 1.4 ohm-ig is felment, pedig 0.6 és 0.4 ohm-osak voltak csak a PODfejek. És hiába vettem ki és tettem be újra 100x, egyszerűen cseszett normálisan mérni. Ilyen egy elbaszott konstrukciót ritkán látni, úgyhogy mindenki jól nézze meg. :sweat_smile:

(Azt csak halkan jegyzem meg, mert nem biztos, hogy így van, csak sejteni vélem, hogy ekkora fiaskó csak akkor fordulna elő, ha nem fejlesztenek külön chipset-et az új funkciók miatt, hanem beleteszik a már meglévő, mechára tervezett chipset-et. Olcsóság rulez!)

10 Likes

Hát, nekem az összes ismerősöm/rokonom akik átszoktak, mind poddal szoktak át és a mai napig azt szívják. Nincs köztük gyerek, sem kocabagós, viszont többen is 55 év felettiek. Nem mindenkit érdekel ez a tekergetés, vattázás, én is kezdem megunni. Ami Neked értelmetlen, az nem biztos, hogy másnak is az. :blush: Viszont azt én is rühellem, mikor egy adott podfejhez kiadnak 500ezer féle gépet. :man_facepalming:

7 Likes

Természetesen neked is igazat adok - ez a másik oldala a dolgoknak.

6 Likes

Köszönöm. :hugs: De ne érts félre, az értelmét én sem látom annak, hogy naponta kiadnak 20 pod gépet (ennek a fele kb. ugyanazt a fejet használja :laughing:)

@Vaperina_Kinga Neked pedig köszönjük a tesztet. :hugs:

6 Likes

Köszi Kinga!

6 Likes

Én nem értek egyet veled…pontosabban megértem, hogy kényelemre törekedsz annak minden hátrányával, de az ökológiai lábnyoma akkora ezeknek mint egy mamutnak. Szóval én betiltanám az összeset és ha máskép nem megy akkor az előretekert coil-okat erőltetném a csakis rba pod-dal árult hardverekhez/üres podfejekhez. A beépített akkukat is tiltanám emellett.
Kb pont az ilyen a pod-okból nincs egy sem most a piacon…nem potyára, a profitérdek találkozott a lustasággal/kényelmességgel a környezet kárára.

6 Likes

Van aki kényszerből szokik át az olcsósítás miatt,és pont az a korosztály kb.
Ezren forintos porlasztó árak mellett én nem biztos hogy cserélnék porlasztós kazánra (persze ha lehet kapni,és félni hogy mikor sül be)
Maradok az rta tekergetésnél amíg működik a kezem,és szemem.
Főleg azért mert desszert dohánytól a hűs gyümölcsig megtalálható a kedvenceim között és nem töltök dohányra gyümölcsöt :smiling_face:

7 Likes

Nem is kell, hogy egyetérts velem. Mindenki azt szív amit akar, meg ugye mindenkinek az a jó ami épp neki van. Én nem fogok itt vitatkozni senkivel, van nekem ennél jobb dolgom is. :man_shrugging:

5 Likes

Én sem vitaindítónak szántam.

5 Likes

Nekem is :smiling_face:

4 Likes

Sziasztok :waving_hand:

Én úgy gondolom, hogy nem is történhetett volna jobb a vape iparral és a vaperek megítélésével, mint a podok megjelenése, és itt NEM az eldobhatósakra gondolok és nem is azokra akik a marketingkampányukat direkt a fiatalokra építették fel vagy a hasonló botrányokra (juul, elfbar és társai), tehát ezektől elvonatkoztatva a többségre és úgy általában a pod rendszerre. (Minél többen állnak át, annál nagyobb lesz a támogatottság…) Gondoljunk bele mennyi dohányos ember szokott át poddal, akik korábban macerásnak vagy bonyolultnak találták az e-cigit, illetve köztük is nagy számban voltak akik ugyan kipróbálták, DE megfelelő segítség hiányában nem tudtak átállni mert nem az ő igényeikhez volt jó amivel próbálkoztak. Innen egyenes út vezetett a többségnek vissza a cigizéshez. Ők és még sokan mások kaptak egy új esélyt a podokkal és az esetek többségében ez be is vált, válik. Nem véletlen, hogy a podok felé is tendál az ipar… A gyártók folyamatos versenyben vannak ami hozza magával a fejlődést, ezt csak így lehet.

A podok megjelenése és a vape ipar fellendülése hívta fel jobban a figyelmet az esetleges egészségügyi kockázatokra és arra, hogy a fiatalok körében mennyire elterjedt az e-cigi. Ami persze betulajdonítható annak pár gyártónak aki kifejezetten őket, ezt a korosztályt célozta meg akár influenszereken keresztül és persze azoknak akiktől a mai napig be lehet szerezni mindenféle megkötés nélkül. (alig várom, hogy eltűnjenek a…ba az elfbar, poco rendelős webshopok és csoportok) Ez ugyan a mi kárunkra történt javarészt, de érthető, hogy ha minél többen használják annál jobban kell vizsgálni és szabályozni, amiben azért jó döntés is született pl: a fiatalkorúak és nemdohányzók védelme (igaz ez valamivel korábbról ered), de annál több rossz és megmagyarázhatatlan is. Én ezt nem a pod hibájának tekintem, hanem inkább az emberi hülyeségnek és annak, hogy mindig vannak olyanok akik arra szakosodtak, hogy a jó dolgokat elrontják. Ez ebben az esetben is igaz sajnos. Illetve azt se felejtsük el, hogy minden országban más-más törvények vonatkoznak az e-cigire.

Ha valamit lehet egyszerűsíteni, ha valamin lehet könnyíteni, akkor miért ne? Nem mindenki szeretne jobban belemélyülni a vape világba és ez nem is várható el, csak a cigitől szeretne megszabadulni és jobbá tenni a saját és a környezetében élők életét. Mára a podok többsége kifejezetten jónak mondható, kezdőknek, frissen átállóknak talán a legjobb választás.

A lényeg úgyis az, hogy váltani tudott és el tudta dobni a cigit. A többi, hogy mivel az már részletkérdés. Ebből a szempontból édes mindegy, hogy ezt poddal vagy egy másik szettel tette meg.

Akit jobban elkezd érdekelni a téma az úgyis kacsingatni fog más irányba is, DE azt se felejtsük el, hogy sokaknál mindig ott van a pod, mint backup készülék, amihez mindig nyúlhat, ha nem jön össze egy építés vagy nincs kedve tekerni stb… és ez így van jól, nyugalmat, biztonságot ad és nem enged visszaesni.

Összegezve, egyszerű és jelentősen megkönnyíti az átállást aminél fontosabbat nem nagyon tudnék mondani. Mindenki a saját preferenciáihoz mérten fog készüléket választani és attól még ugyanúgy vaper lesz, semmi elítélendő nincs ebben szerintem.

13 Likes

Jelen POD esetében sem az ízzel, gőzzel, vagy a vape élménnyel volt gond, hanem a konstrukcióval. De ez 1 az 100-ból, vagy 1000-ből. Én szeretem a POD-okat is, és eddig bármilyen POD járt nálam mindig addig használtam amíg el nem fogytak a porlasztók vagy cartridge-ek, mert egyszerűen jók és kész. Sokszor jó volt “lustának” lenni és csak PODfejet cserélni. Nálam mindig van/lesz egy POD az RTA-k mellett.

Átállás szempontjából szerintem is egy POD hatalmas lökést tud adni, akár a vape többi iránya felé. Jelen vannak, a többsége nagyon jó tud lenni és inkább egy POD mint a cigi! Ezért kár is ellene beszélni.

10 Likes